So?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a4a1/5a4a12b8b1a67c560e27b367be188ddcd36a2aa5" alt=""
oder so?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e356c/e356c7d0ebdec6caed71b571ea8cf117cf12a937" alt=""
RAW in Capture One, S/W Umsetzung mit "ConvertToBW"
Nachtrag
Carl said:
… my strong response is that the color version is richer, more visually rewarding.and Michael asks:
What would it look like if you brought the contrast up as much in the colour as in the B&W?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10b5b/10b5b1441ebae47fb4b1732e1fcd13a2d0695e94" alt=""
As I see now, there is really no need to transform in b&W.
In opposite, the "cubistic" head that I see in the wall is actually a little bit stronger in color.
In this case, while the b&w version is certainly more dramatic, my strong response is that the color version is richer, more visually rewarding.
AntwortenLöschen... I love red, black/white and dramatic. - the b&w is more profound and the color version is not red... ;-)
AntwortenLöschenhappy days
DET
detlev schilke
The more I look on these pictures, the more I'm insecure which one is the "better" version.
AntwortenLöschenBut I am sure, Brassai would have done it in b&w !-)
What would it look like if you brought the contrast up as much in the colour as in the B&W?
AntwortenLöschen